<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>culturefried.com &#187; crowdsourcing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.culturefried.com/index.php/tag/crowdsourcing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.culturefried.com</link>
	<description>A unique blend of talented, culturally diverse people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CouplesSpark — Relational Disputes Go Communal</title>
		<link>http://www.culturefried.com/index.php/2010/07/26/crowdsourcing-relational-disputes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.culturefried.com/index.php/2010/07/26/crowdsourcing-relational-disputes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aliera p.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culturefried.com/?p=2258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CouplesSpark  is a social media site that allows couples to post a conflict that they're struggling to move beyond and put the issue to a vote among the CouplesSpark community. Supposedly, the service allows couples who may not be able to afford relational therapy a way to work out their difficulties, but I wonder at the effectiveness of airing one's dirty laundry to the public, as it were. <a href="http://www.culturefried.com/index.php/2010/07/26/crowdsourcing-relational-disputes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2262" title="fighting-couple" src="http://www.culturefried.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fighting-couple-300x204.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="204" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.couplesspark.com/">CoupleSpark</a> is a social media site that allows couples to post a conflict that they&#8217;re struggling to move beyond and put the issue to a vote among the CouplesSpark community. Supposedly, the service allows couples who may not be able to afford relational therapy a way to work out their difficulties, but I wonder at the effectiveness of airing one&#8217;s dirty laundry to the public, as it were.</p>
<p>In a perfect world, this community could lend some helpful benefits to a quarreling couple, saving their relationship and  yielding a happier, more vibrant couples experience for the partners in question. However, as I crawled the site exploring conflicts, it seems like the site lends itself more to hateful criticisms and public aspersion supported by the volume of &#8220;thumbs-up&#8221; you receive for your point of view on the dispute, which would in turn lead to further angst.<span id="more-2258"></span></p>
<p>I also wonder as to the nature of users this type of site attracts. I&#8217;m sure there are a large number of individuals who are truly interested in the site for the thrill of taking an active role in helping another couple, but I&#8217;m also sure that there&#8217;s a conflicting demographic whose fascination with the service has little to do with being a nonpartisan party in a time of need.</p>
<p><em><strong>Would you ever consider </strong><a href="http://twitter.com/crowdsourcing">crowdsourcing</a><strong> your relational disputes? </strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.culturefried.com/index.php/2010/07/26/crowdsourcing-relational-disputes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

